Energy & Environment Management_logo

Application of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in groundwater quality evaluation: A case study of arid region

作者
  • Leela Kaur

    Maharaja Ganga Singh University, Bikaner

    Author

  • Prem Godara

    Maharaja Ganga Singh University, Bikaner

    Author

关键词:
Principal component analysis, Eigenvalues, Groundwater quality, Arid region
摘要

Principal component analysis (PCA) is a commanding tool for assessing groundwater quality. It has potential to reduce data complexity, identify substantial variables, and disclose patterns. Groundwater quality dynamics could be understood well by using PCA which would advance the management and protection strategies of groundwater resources. The study aims to evaluate groundwater quality of an arid region of India. Principal component analysis was done for two seasons for two consecutive years by utilizing Minitab software. Groundwater samples of pre-monsoon 2019 shows that parameters like EC, TDS, TH, sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, chloride, fluoride, sulfate, bicarbonate, uranium, and zinc have major contribution in groundwater quality. All parameters come under first principal component (except carbonate and nitrate) in pre-monsoon 2020. While, the principal component analysis of monsoon season of 2019 and 2020 display that all the parameters fall under first principal component with exception of manganese and nitrate for monsoon 2019 and bicarbonate, carbonate, nitrate, EC, TDS, and chromium in monsoon 2020. Henceforth, PCA provides a comprehensive and insightful analysis that aids in effective groundwater quality assessment and management.

##submission.authorBiography##
  1. ##submission.authorWithAffiliation##

    Department of Environmental Science

    Research Scholar

参考

[1] Rao S N, Rao, P J, Subrahmanyam A 2007 Journal of Geological Society of India 69 959

[2] Pandey H K, Singh V K, Srivastava S K, Singh R P 2023 Sustainable Water Resources Management 9 197

[3] Patnaik M, Tudu C, Bagal D K 2024 Applied Geomatics 16, 281

[4] Nathan N S, Saravanane R, Sundararajan T 2017 Computational Water, Energy, and Environmental Engineering 6 243

[5] Reddy K S, Kumar M S 2012 Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 11 425

[6] Chandrasekhar R, Rao L V 2021 International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology 12 23

[7] Ali S, Verma S, Agarwal MB, Islam R, Mehrotra M, Deolia RK, Kumar J, Singh S, Mohammadi AA, Raj D, Gupta MK, Dang P, Fattahi M 2024 Scientific Reports 14, 5381

[8] Gautam V K, Kothari M, Al-Ramadan B, Singh P K, Upadhyay H, Pande C B, Alshehri F, Yaseen Z M 2024 PLoS ONE 19 e0294533

[9] Singh G, Chaudhary S, Giri B S, Mishra V K 2025 Environmental Science & Pollution Research International 32 4199

[10] Taşan M, Demir Y, Taşan S 2022 Water Supply 22 3431

[11] Abdelgawad M A, El-Sheikh R 2023 Water 15 1374

[12] Arıman S, Soydan-Oksal N G, Beden N, Ahmadzai H 2024 Water 16 1570

[13] Roy B N, Roy H, Rahman K S, Mahmud F, Bhuiyan M M K, Hasan M, Bhuiyan A K, Hasan M, Mahbub M S, Jahedi R M, Islam M S 2024 City and Environment interactions 23 100150

[14] APHA 2017 Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (23rd ed.) Washington DC, American Public Health Association

Cover Image
eem.v1.n2
##submission.downloads##
已出版
##submission.updatedOn##
##submission.versions##
栏目
Articles
##submission.license##

##submission.copyrightStatement##

##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##

相似文章

您也可以开始高级相似性搜索此文章。